Saturday, November 27, 2010

a few things to be thankful for

It's the day after Thanksgiving, and as I was walking into Octane, I came across this very fitting chalk painting on Howell Mill.

@ Howell Mill & Brady Ave (feel free to use, with credit)
I'm thankful for pink heels and the Atlanta skyline.

I'm thankful, of course, for my family. For my friends. For growing up in a world that never told me that I wasn't capable of being what I wanted to be. For the opportunity to create opportunities for other people.

I'm thankful for the country I come from and the country I call home.

I'm thankful for my health.

Sawra, ready for gameday, and thankful to be a Tech fan (feel free to use, with credit)
And, although it's been hard this season, I'm thankful for football. Clean, old-fashioned hate kicks off tomorrow at 7:45 PM.

Hope y'all had a great Thanksgiving, and go Jackets!

Thursday, November 18, 2010

a few statistics in global health

Last Friday Massachusetts General Hospital's Center for Global Health had its first annual symposium. It was an incredible turnout - at least 300 or so were in attendance. Lots of good thoughts as I try and wrap up my research paper, but one in particular:

(photo courtesy of MedShare - if you live in Atlanta and don't know about MedShare, you need to volunteer)
I posed a question to Kris Olson, who is a pediatrician and doctor of internal medicine at Mass Gen, and also the Director of the Global Health Initiative for CIMIT, about public-private partnerships and how we make innovation for the developing world a sustainable venture for the developed world. He didn't have an answer (no one does, and even now, only a few people are trying to figure that out), but he did bring up some interesting statistics and the need for healthcare innovation:
~ 40% of needles used to vaccinate children in developing countries have been used in another child before
95% of medical equipment (what we call "durable medical equipment", or DME) in resource-limited areas is donated equipment
90% of those devices fail in the first five years
Dr. Larson, while acknowledging the need for innovation in the space, made a great point: "A need does not necessarily equal a market." Not sure if we can find a way around that, or create a market, or develop a nontraditional market, but answering that question and monetizing that market goes a long way to improving global health in all regions of the world.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

designing around the generation gap, in goods and experiences

Last night, Rafael and I were marveling again at how little human interaction a business trip actually takes as we picked up our rental car at BWI. Everything was going smoothly - flight landed on time, bags arrived, the Hertz Gold Club had us listed on the billboard, and we were just talking about how an interaction-less culture means a higher bottom line for a company, when we discovered that they had given us a hybrid.
(Nissan Altima hybrid, courtesy of...)
Being the office treehugger, I of course was thrilled. I've driven a hybrid once before (the HS250, and while it's not perfect and there are some peculiar styling details in the center console that I don't adore, it's still a great first stab at a luxury hybrid). Rafael, on the other hand, was not so excited. On normal days, he drives a C280 that was made in Germany and imported into the United States. He loves the feel of the road and the paradigm of driving for him is driven by lots of sounds and textures. It's much harder for someone like that to get used to a car that is silent upon starting up. In fact, it took him three tries of pushing the On button to realize that the car was actually on, and in fact we were in a hybrid vehicle.

While we laughed about it on our drive to dinner (with Rafael nicknaming our Nissan Altima as "the sewing machine"), we started talking about how generational differences make for different user experiences. Like traveling for business without interacting with a single customer service representative, driving a hybrid is an experience tailored for a specific generation. My paradigm of driving has been developed over eight years, and has always involved one primary vehicle. My boss, on the other hand, has been driving for almost 30 years, and those layers of memories and thoughts toward the experience of being on the road shape his product preferences very strongly. Those paradigms are different; the things we value are different.

Back to business travel - I'm part of a generation that has always valued time as its most precious resource. Unlike baby boomers, who chase money after growing up in a relatively less well-off setting as their parents were still handicapped by the economic climate of the 30s when they were starting careers, and unlike Generation Xers, who chase family time after growing up never seeing their parents as they strived to fulfill their American Dream, we grew up overscheduled with ball games and tutoring and soccer practice and flute lessons.

So now, we don't chase money. We want time. We want all of our time to count for something. We recognize that once it's gone, we can't make more. And that says something about why we flock to things like climate change and public health. We have a defined amount of time on earth to tackle these problems.

The culture of business travel is ok for Generation Y, because things that are designed to automate the process also take us less time to accomplish. The culture of business travel is also ok for the Baby Boomers, because they value money. But Generation X traditionally values interaction.

So what does that mean for a user experience designer? How do you design for people who have very different paradigms of how the world should be? The user preferences aren't always the same. In some cases, the end goals aren't even the same. It's not always practical to design different experiences for each of those groups. How do you make sure you've identified with one without alienating the others?

One man's dream car is another man's sewing machine.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

happy election day (it's a post about Halo)

Three months ago, despite the warnings and news stories, I took a trip to our manufacturing facility in Cuidad Juarez. Let me tell you, it was a surreal experience. Mexico is very much a developing country, and it doesn’t look much different from India (with fewer people, more paved roads, and no random animals walking the streets). Border towns in Mexico are regularly patrolled by armed National Police standing in the backs of jeeps. As one of my friends described it, the border security in Mexico is like seeing a live game of Halo.
Zaragoza land bridge in El Paso, Texas/Juarez, Mexico. (feel free to use, with credit)
Over the weekend, two Americans were killed on the land border bridge we crossed to get back into the States – the Zaragoza International Bridge. A third was killed in the city itself.

It’s sad to see a city, and really, a country, be consumed by this kind of violence. We don’t often think of Mexico as a developing country, but it’s not that far off. Juarez is one of a string of maquiladoras that’s been affected by drug violence. I have to wonder how long American companies can continue their operations in Mexico (which offers significantly lower labor costs for labor-intensive manufacturing operations). Many have already left. For the 1.3 million Mexicans that are employed by these maquila factories, a plant closure has a devastating effect on their well-being and empowerment.

A lack of empowerment, and still, voter turnout remains lower in the United States than in Mexico.
The American flag, as seen from the Zaragoza bridge.
It’s an election day to count our blessings.